Picking two offers you have already heard of and then defending them is how most affiliates stall. The argument here says behave like somebody tasting instead of somebody with a favourite dish. Run several campaigns at once, put different offers in front of the same traffic, and let what happens tell you which ones people actually want.
That is the sharpest idea on the blog and it is genuinely uncomfortable, because accepting it means accepting that your instinct about what will work is not evidence.
The writing keeps returning to scale and to being lost inside it. A good blog can drift unnoticed for years while an ordinary one gets read, and the difference is rarely the quality of the sentences. He is honest that consistency closes that gap, and equally honest that consistency is the part nobody wants to hear about.
There is a piece on Africa as the place marketing will have to reckon with next, written from close enough to matter rather than forecast from outside it.
Start with the offers post if you are promoting something and cannot tell whether the problem is the traffic or the thing itself.