Lets Take a Walk Together?
Restored from the Empower Network archive (2011–2017), lightly edited to meet our current advertising standards. Views are the original author’s.
(San Jose, California)-Why do we live the way that we do? Is it that we can’t do any better? Or is it that we are not interested in doing any better? We are some what stuck in a habitual way of doing things and to weak to do any better? What is it? In what way do you the readers think that we order go into this? We are walking together, talking together, two friends looking at something that the both of them are very concerned about? They want answers, they want to find out and they want stop until they have sufficiently gone complete through it? May we start the walk now? Will you walk with the writer?
The writer thinks that our seriousness is lacking. We don’t have sufficient seriousness to go into things and see them to the “END”. We never complete thing one step at a time, we are always scattered about doing different things for one reason or another and very superficial. So what do you think can we begin like this? We will begin?
When one changes inwardly/internally, do you the readers think that it will have economical circumstances? Everything will change economically; it has to if the human that is conducting the economical trade has completely changed? Does this frighten you the readers? Now while knowing that we are in a crisis and that we are not the fully potential human beings that we could be we still accept things as they are? Why do we not stand up for our selves? Why do we take the beating over and over again constantly getting up to be knocked back down?
Is it that you like the way you are living? The writer thinks that it is much deeper than that, don’t you? What’s involved with it? Is it that you will be going against the current of things and that terrifies you, an objective insecurity? This also implies that you must stand-alone. As we have looked at before there are genuine insecurities and there are fallacies of insecurity. One would be completely away from the normal stream of how things are done, which means that you will have to psychologically stand-alone and whether the human being can stand that?
One would be complete away from the herding instinct, that all the totalitarian people support, it is sort of a tradition to follow this or that one be like him or her you know what the writer is getting at, don’t you? It is all based on competitiveness and comparing along with a false sense of togetherness! “So can we say that one of the main reasons humankind has not and don’t radically transform psychologically is because that are frighten of not belonging to a group, herd or the masses, something definite?” Which implies that they would have to stand completely psychologically alone, the writer thinks from that aloneness you can only cooperate not the other way around?
“Anthropologist have found that ancient people belonging to there tribe, they feel lost without it and there psychological structure depends on there belonging to a tribe!” The writer feels that this is one of the reasons that we are frighten and don’t want to let go. If one clings to the misery that you already know then coming to another misery that you don’t know. Then you are stuck. By being with other we feel safe, belonging to a group or herd its much more than a comparing it is a sense of being looked after and safety in numbers and being guided when need be. Fundamentally it will be all right because the group is large and wise and its like a mothering and fathering that can go on endlessly.
===>HOLISTIC FITNESS/LIVING HELP<===
The feeling of aloneness in its self has a great deal involved in it. It is not isolation or being apart, furthermore it is a form of supreme intelligence and in that intelligence there is a complete psychological security. When one sees the appalling mess and misery that we live in and one says that there needs to be a complete change that human being has already began to move away from the mess.
To identify and remain with a group or herd, what does it mean? What is involved in this process? The group is you and you are the group. Furthermore you are like cooperating with your self, your very existence is first being implied in the group, everything about you has come from the group, you feel that you are nothing without the group. Again which is a total ancient tribal way of life, deeply. So when one-steps out of the group everything, as they know it collapses, the whole universe around them.
The writer thinks that that is it the fear of being alone, translated, being isolated from the very thing that you know? The writer is saying that when one is genuinely alone there is no isolation from the universe, on the contrary. So we have to be free of the fallacies of identification with the group as if it is the universe. Now is it that we hold on to our miseries, conditions and habits because we don’t know anything else? The known is safer that the unknown?
Furthermore to be alone implies, doesn’t it, to step out of the stream of the known? All of this entire confusion, disorder, hope, sorrow, tradition, fear, travails, beliefs, despair and all the rest, step out of it. To go much deeper if we may to be alone implies not to carry the burden of tradition with you at-all? Tradition being collective knowledge and the group. To be alone implies total psychological freedom, when there’s that great freedom you are one with the universe. How can one say that they are the universe when they are in total confusion, unhappy, miserable, anxious, jealous, envy with everything happening how can one say that they are the universe, that would be a very dangerous statement!
“Universe implies total order, inwardly/internally psychologically!” The word cosmos in Greek means order; chaos is what we live with. How can someone say that order is inside of him or her when they live in chaos, which is one of the old tricks and mind games that we play with our selves? There might be disorder out there but inside of me is that I am one with world, sorry, but NOT! That is an illusion a concept that thought has put there to sustain the illusion that we are all right and that we need no change, “HOPE”. It is not a reality, what is the actual reality is ones confusion and chaos. See/perceive this truth and the breaking down of the patterns have begun!
One must start with the fact of what you are which is in chaos, chaos is the group (religious leaders and political leaders with all the rest), the whole thing is a chaos. To move away from that chaos and into the cosmos means not that I am alone but total psychological order that has no association with the chaos and disorder of the group at all, that is alone. Now if there was the writer, the readers and the listeners, we are one with the cosmos which is supreme psychological order, there would only be that supreme order, there wouldn’t be a writer, reader and listener there would only be three humans that’s one with the universe. Are you following the writer?
Furthermore there is no inward/internal fragmentation, which means no bird or tree or ground, this is a tremendous thing! Are you with the writer? This is the essence of seeing/perceiving directly “WHAT IS”! You see we must move away from the chaos, and this chaos is what we know. We are frighten of an idea that has projected that we are alone and no one to rely on, rely on-dependent of. Frighten of an idea of being alone, by your self, no one else. Being in chaotic conditions, to move away from that we have the feeling that we will be alone-isolated, lonely and we are terrified of that. So we choose to stay where we are. The wrier thinks that it may be one of the factors of humankind not radically changing.
It is like the tribal beings worst punishment is to be cast out of the tribe. This may become more a simple and pure form when humankind admits to this in today’s modern world?
===>HOLISTIC FITNESS/LIVING HELP<===