A study appears suggesting fish oil raises prostate cancer risk, and the response on this blog stays unusually careful. Fidencio Reyna quotes the objection that it was a one-time survey rather than a trial with a placebo group, notes that it cannot argue for or against supplementing, and leaves you better equipped than the headline did.
That habit runs through the health writing. A two part piece attributes a fortnight of fat loss to one dietary change and explains the reasoning rather than simply naming it. A post on staying in shape after a fixed challenge ends starts from nutrition and meal preparation, on the argument that the challenge was meant to lay a foundation rather than build a peak.
There is a piece on authenticity that reads as a note to himself about why the blog had gone stale.
The boxing post is pure enjoyment.
Read the fish oil post if a health headline has ever changed what you buy.