{"id":335,"date":"2012-08-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2012-08-17T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/empowernetwork.com\/pesamob\/yahowah-sent-his-ben-son-into-the-world-so-that-gentiles-could-be-adopted-into-his-family-receiving-yahowshas-inheritance\/"},"modified":"2026-08-04T00:39:32","modified_gmt":"2026-08-04T00:39:32","slug":"yahowah-sent-his-ben-son-into-the-world-so-that-gentiles-could-be-adopted-into-his-family-receiving-yahowshas-inheritance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/empowernetwork.com\/pesamob\/yahowah-sent-his-ben-son-into-the-world-so-that-gentiles-could-be-adopted-into-his-family-receiving-yahowshas-inheritance\/","title":{"rendered":"Yahowah sent His ben-Son into the world so that Gentiles could be adopted into His family, receiving Yahowsha\u2019s inheritance."},"content":{"rendered":"

Yahowah sent His ben<\/em>-Son into the world so that Gentiles could be adopted into His family, receiving Yahowsha\u2019s inheritance.It is one of the most beautiful uses of the father-son metaphor.<\/p>\n

Isaiah 40:5 says the same thing in different words: \u201cThe glorious presence and the manifestation of power, the person<\/strong> of Yahowah is revealed<\/strong> and made known for all mankind<\/strong> to observe, consider and learn from the only begotten son of God.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Now that we know why Yahowah used ben<\/em>-son in reference to the Ma\u2019aseyah, and understand its implications on us, we can finish the prophecy Nathan was sharing with Dowd. Speaking of the Ma\u2019aseyah, Yahowah said: \u201cWhen wrongdoing and sin<\/strong> (\u2018awah <\/em>\u2013 distortion and perversity) are associated with <\/strong>(\u2018asher <\/em>\u2013 linked to) Him, I will punish Him with a kindly intent<\/strong> (yakach<\/em> \u2013correct and make right by Him, vindicate, having a reasoned legal dialogue so as to resolve the dispute) with the rod<\/strong> (shebet<\/em> \u2013 staff or scepter, offshoot or branch) of men and with the blows<\/strong> (nega\u2019<\/em> \u2013 stripes and wounds) of the sons of \u2018Adam.\u201d<\/strong> (Shamow\u2019el \/ Listen to God \/ 2 Samuel 7:14)<\/p>\n

The phrase, \u201cwhen wrongdoing and sin is associated with Him I will punish Him,\u201d has been corrected to comply with the original Hebrew text. Most English translations render this verse \u201cwhen he commits iniquity I will chastise him.\u201d The Ma\u2019aseyah didn\u2019t commit iniquity, for if he had, He would have suffered chastisement for His own sin, not ours. The key to the correction is in the Hebrew word \u2018asher<\/em>, often translated \u201cif or when.\u201d \u2018Asher <\/em>provides \u201ca relative reference and a marker of linkage or association that affects a result.\u201d Strong\u2019s<\/em> notes that \u201cas it is indeclinable, \u2018asher<\/em> is often used to show a connection<\/em>.\u201d Therefore, the phrase really means, \u201cWhen sin is associated with, linked or connected to,<\/em> Him God will chastise Him with a kindly intent.\u201d The prophet is predicting, actually confirming, that Yahowsha\u2019 would suffer for our sins! The iniquity of all mankind would be associated with the Ma\u2019aseyah just as the prophets had foretold.<\/p>\n

Yakach<\/em> is especially meaningful in this context. It is first used in Genesis 31:37, where yakach<\/em> means \u201cto evaluate, decide, and judge.\u201d In other words, Yahowah is going to consider the stripes, blows, and wounds inflicted upon Yahowsha\u2019 as punishment for our sins. Our transgressions will be associated with Him so that they won\u2019t be associated with us. That is why the \u201cpunishment had a kindly intent.\u201d The legal dispute against us was resolved in our favor, vindicating us, making us right with God.<\/p>\n

The prophecy concludes with: \u201cBut My unchanging love and mercy<\/strong> (checed<\/em> \u2013 faithfulness, steadfast goodness, and unfailing kindness) shall not depart from<\/strong> (cuwr<\/em> \u2013 turn away from, be removed from, forsake or abandon) Him\u2026. Your family, home, and house<\/strong> (bayith<\/em>) and your kingdom shall be supported, confirmed, upheld, established and nourished<\/strong> (\u2018aman<\/em>) forever and ever.\u201d<\/strong> (Shamow\u2019el \/ Listen to God \/ 2 Samuel 7:15-16) Yah\u2019s favorable treatment of His family is forever so we shall always enjoy living in Yahowah\u2019s home.<\/p>\n

Dowd continued to be the last forefather of Yahowsha\u2019 designated in Scripture until Yahuwdah\u2019s declining years. Yahowah finally had enough of their rebellion and allowed Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, to haul the flower of Judean society into captivity. The king that evoked such wrath was Jeconiah.<\/p>\n

So through Yirmayah, Yahowah prophesied, \u201cAs I live,\u201d says Yahowah, \u201cthough Jeconiah the son of Jehoiakim, king of Judah, were the seal on My right hand, yet I would tear you away. I will give you into the hand of those who seek your life, and into the hand of those whose presence you fear\u2014the hand of Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon and the Chaldeans. So I will throw you out\u2026into another country where you were not born. There you shall die. To the land which you desire to return, you shall not return. This man Jeconiah is a despised and contemptible broken idol, a vessel in which nothing exists. On what account are he and his descendants cast out and thrown into a land which they do not know?\u201d<\/strong> (Yirmayahuw \/ Rise Up to Yah \/ Jeremiah 22:24-28)<\/p>\n

Now the only way the Ma\u2019aseyah could reign in harmony with the predictions would be if He were to legally occupy the throne of Dowd without being a descendent of Jeconiah. His seed had now been disqualified. That is why there are two genealogies of Yahowsha\u2019 in the Greek texts. The first is in Matthew. Sure enough, there\u2019s Jeconiah, ugly as sin, right between Josiah and Shealtiel. This lineage runs through Joseph, the legal line of Yahowsha\u2019 as calculated through the male heir. But Yahowsha\u2019 was born of a virgin; the prophets predicted it, and the apostles reported it. Mary\u2019s genealogy, recorded in Luke, shows that Yahowsha\u2019 was a descendent of Dowd, but not of Solomon. Mary\u2019s line went through Dowd\u2019s son Nathan. While it looked like the Ma\u2019aseyah lineage predictions had hit an impossible snag, God had a plan. A virgin descendant of Dowd was miraculously inseminated, giving birth to a son while betrothed to Judah\u2019s legitimate heir, thereby fulfilling the prophecies and avoiding the taint of Jeconiah.<\/p>\n

Ma\u2019aseyah was expected to come from Judah\u2019s royal line, the family of Dowd: He was also to be a priest, but not of the order of Aaron, for that would have required Him to be of the tribe of Levi, not Judah. Dowd wrote of Him, \u201cYahowah has sworn, and will not relent, \u2018You are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.\u2019\u201d<\/strong> (Psalm 110:4) This was something unique: no one had ever been prophet, priest, and<\/em> king\u2014much less eternal.<\/p>\n

The length of Ma\u2019aseyah\u2019s reign, described here as \u201cforever,\u201d was restated in dozens of places, such as Psalm 89:3-4: \u201cI have made a covenant with My chosen, I have sworn to My servant Dowd: \u2018Your seed I will establish forever, and build up your throne to all generations.\u2019\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

efei<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s examine the prediction of the virgin birth. It\u2019s in Yasha\u2019yah 7, the 14th<\/sup> verse. To set the scene, Yahowah is speaking to King \u2018Achaz, the father of Hezekiah, by way of His prophet Yasha\u2019yahuw. He is trying to bolster the king\u2019s faith because the monarch had chosen to form a protective alliance with Assyria rather than Yahowah. The year is 734 BCE.<\/p>\n

\u201cAsk for a miraculous sign<\/strong> (\u2018owth <\/em>\u2013 a wondrous symbol which God gives to demonstrate his power, a witness which serves as proof, an example from which to evaluate, consent, and agree) in association with<\/strong> (\u2018im <\/em>\u2013indicating something done together with) Yahowah your<\/strong> God.\u201d<\/strong> (Yasha\u2019yahuw \/ Salvation is from Yah \/ Isaiah 7:11)<\/p>\n

The use of \u2018owth<\/em> is significant. The \u201cmiraculous sign\u201d that follows \u201cdemonstrates God\u2019s power and provides a witness that proves\u201d His existence and plan. It will be something that we can \u201cevaluate and consent to.\u201d \u2018Owth<\/em> is never used in the context of ordinary things. For example, Isaiah uses \u2018owth<\/em> to describe Yahowah\u2019s miraculous dealings with Yisra\u2019el during the last days.<\/p>\n

Yahowah selected \u2018im<\/em> to describe His beryth<\/em>-covenant with Abraham. Hebrew dictionaries tell us that \u2018im <\/em>is \u201cused to convey something that is being done together: walk together, eat together, converse together, and live together.\u201d Yahowah, via the Ma\u2019aseyah, would do all of these things with man which is why \u2018im<\/em> is used in this verse. Additionally, \u201c\u2018im <\/em>is often used to indicate the origin of something.\u201d For example, in Bare\u2019syth<\/em> \/ Genesis 41:32, Yahowah is communicating with Joseph, a man whose life predicts and models Yahowsha\u2019s: \u201cIt is because the word<\/strong> (dabar<\/em>) is prepared, established, and made firm, standing upright<\/strong> (kuwn<\/em>) apart from<\/strong> (min<\/em>) and together with<\/strong> (\u2018im<\/em>) God.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yahowah put the miraculous sign He was offering to perform in an eternal life and death context. Isaiah told \u2018Ahaz: \u201cAsk profoundly<\/strong> (\u2018amaq <\/em>\u2013 pertaining to a condition which is deeply thoughtful and insightful, difficult to understand), either of She\u2019owl <\/strong>(she\u2019owl<\/em> \u2013 the place where the dead reside; from sha\u2019al<\/em>, meaning to ask and enquire, to seek and request) or of the upward extent <\/strong>(gabah <\/em>\u2013 highest elevated spatial position or dimension) of the highest dimensions<\/strong> (ma\u2019al<\/em> \u2013 the highest countable unit of measure or entity pertaining to a spatial position or orientation, based upon \u2018alah<\/em>, to increase, ascend, and be superior).\u201d <\/strong>(Yasha\u2019yahuw \/ Salvation is from Yah \/ Isaiah 7:11)<\/p>\n

A cursory reading of the king\u2019s reply would seem to indicate that \u2018Ahaz wasn\u2019t keen on the idea of putting Yahowah to the test. He didn\u2019t capitalize on the opportunity to be the first to know what would be asked of those in She\u2019owl or, more profoundly, didn\u2019t enquire about the dimensions which exist beyond the three mankind knew at the time. But I think the issue was deeper than that. The king rejected Yahowah and refused His sign. \u2018Ahaz had already aligned himself and his nation with the Adversary, putting Yahowah\u2019s chosen people into a covenant with the sun-god Assur. \u2018Ahaz didn\u2019t want a miracle from God because he was expecting one from Satan.<\/p>\n

So God volunteered a sign that would lead less corrupted and more faithful humans out of She\u2019owl and into His realm of gabah ma\u2019al<\/em>\u2014the higher dimensions. \u201cTherefore<\/strong> (ken<\/em> \u2013 this is honest and correct, pertaining to being in a right relationship and standing), the foundation of the upright pole <\/strong>(\u2018dn <\/em>\u2013 vocalized as \u2018eden<\/em> meaning firm and strong base which holds pillars upright; used as part of the Tabernacle design) Himself <\/strong>(huw\u2019<\/em> \u2013 a declaration of emphasis and association) will give<\/strong> (natan<\/em> \u2013 permanently bestow a gift, durably consecrate, eternally entrust, deliver up, and produce with certainty and continuity) a miraculous sign<\/strong> (\u2018owth <\/em>\u2013 a wondrous symbol which God gives to demonstrate his power, a witness which serves as proof, an example from which to evaluate, consent, and agree), behold <\/strong>(hineh <\/em>\u2013 pay attention and look, noticing the details; at that time and at an adjacent site) a virgin girl<\/strong> (\u2018almah <\/em>\u2013 a maiden, young female who is unwed and has yet to mate) shall conceive<\/strong> (harah<\/em> \u2013 become pregnant and be with child), giving birth to <\/strong>(yalad<\/em> \u2013 delivering, bearing and bringing forth, begetting) a Son <\/strong>(ben<\/em>), and shall call <\/strong>(qara\u2019<\/em> \u2013 recite and proclaim, appoint and endow) His name <\/strong>(shem<\/em>) Immanuel <\/strong>(\u2018Imanuw\u2019el<\/em> \u2013 With us is God).\u201d <\/strong>(Yasha\u2019yahuw \/ Salvation is from Yah \/ Isaiah 7:14)<\/p>\n

Every word in this sentence is worthy of closer inspection. The verse begins with \u201cTherefore,\u201d<\/strong> from ken<\/em>, telling us that what follows is \u201chonest and correct,\u201d that \u201cit pertains to establishing a right relationship and standing\u201d with \u201cthe Foundation and Upright One.\u201d<\/p>\n

That brings us to \u2018dn <\/em>(Aleph Deleth Nun<\/em>). The consonant root \u2018dn<\/em> (\u05d0\u05d3\u05df) has become the root of great corruption and misunderstanding because \u2018dn<\/em> can be pointed: \u2018adon<\/em>, and translated \u201cmighty, master, and father,\u201d or \u2018edon\/\u2019eden<\/em>, meaning \u201cthe foundation, the upright pillar, and base of the Temple.\u201d<\/strong> As you may recall from the \u201cTaruw\u2019ah\u201d chapter, the Masoretes elected to vocalize \u2018dn<\/em> as \u2018adon <\/em>(\u05d0\u05b8\u05d3\u05d5\u05b9\u05df). These same rabbi\/masters, choosing to present themselves as \u201clords\u201d to rule over men, then said \u2018adon<\/em> meant \u201cLord.\u201d But that can\u2019t be true since Hebrew already had a word for \u201clord,\u201d that being ba\u2019al<\/em>. Ba\u2019al is also the name of the satanic sun-god named \u201cLord,\u201d the false god of the Babylonians and Canaanites. So it is certain Yahowah would not have applied that title to Himself.<\/p>\n

While we have been over this material before, the subject is vitally important. As we discovered, the alternative vocalization of \u2018dn<\/em> is \u2018edon <\/em>or \u2018eden.<\/em> It has very specific connotations pertaining to the Ma\u2019aseyah. \u2018Edon\/\u2019eden<\/em> is \u201cthe foundation in which an upright timber is placed, it is the upright pillar itself, and it is the base of the Tabernacle.\u201d These associations give \u2018edon<\/em> prophetic symbolism, purpose, and meaning in the context of the miraculous virgin birth leading to a son named \u201cGod is with us.\u201d Dany\u2019el \/ Daniel tells us that Yahowah\u2019s Tabernacle, His Qodesh<\/em> of Qodesh<\/em>, is synonymous with Yahowsha\u2019s body. Most all predictions pertaining to Yahowsha\u2019 either present Him as the \u201cUpright One,\u201d or have \u201cstands upright\u201d listed among His characteristics. Further, Yahowsha\u2019s willingness to be nailed to an \u201cupright pole\u201d is significant because the Ma\u2019aseyah\u2019s base or origin, His foundation is God Himself. If the Upright One were not based upon the foundation of God, the sacrifice would have been irrelevant rather than a \u201cpermanently bestowed and eternally consecrated gift.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Scriptural text only shows \u2018dn<\/em>, a word which can be vocalized in just two ways. One is pertinent, prophetic, and profound. The other is irrelevant and potentially misleading. We know the rabbinical religious establishment chose irrelevant and misleading so that they could become relevant by misleading. It\u2019s just a hunch, but I don\u2019t think that was Yahowah\u2019s choice.<\/p>\n

In the midst of this prophecy God transitioned from using \u201cYahowah your God\u201d to \u2018eden, <\/em>\u201cthe firm and strong foundation in which the upright timber is held.\u201d I believe He did this to demonstrate the significance of the \u2018owth<\/em>\u2013miraculous sign of a virgin giving birth to a son named \u2018Immanu\u2019el<\/em>. The selection of \u2018eden<\/em> tells us to whom the Son belongs as well as His purpose for being sent.<\/p>\n

As an interesting aside, had \u2018dn<\/em> been pointed \u2018adon<\/em> and then been translated \u201cfather,\u201d rather than \u201clord,\u201d it would have been relevant, albeit significantly less so than \u201cfoundation of the upright one and temple.\u201d It is the combination of errors that became so deadly. First, Yahowah\u2019s name was errantly replaced by \u2018adon<\/em> 7,000 times, inclusive of the one in this verse. Second, \u2018dn<\/em> was errantly vocalized \u2018adon <\/em>rather than \u2018edon<\/em> every time it was used in reference to Yahowah and Yahowsha\u2019. And third, \u2018adon <\/em>was errantly translated \u201cLord,\u201d rather than \u201cmaster or father\u201d in each of those occurrences.<\/p>\n

Collectively, the result was and continues to be disastrous\u2014the most heinous crime ever perpetrated against man\u2019s soul. Men acting as if they were God, vocalized \u2018dn<\/em> as \u2018adon<\/em> and translated \u2018adon<\/em> \u201cLord.\u201d Thinking they were smarter than God, better communicators than God, more important than God, the Rabbinical\/Master Masoretes substituted Lord\/Baal\u2019s name for Yahowah\u2019s name 7,000 times in His Scripture. By errantly vocalizing \u2018dn<\/em>, by errantly translating \u2018adon<\/em>, Lord, and by errantly replacing Yahowah\u2019s personal name with it, Jews and Christians alike have been deprived of a personal first name relationship with Yahowah. They unknowingly pray to Satan rather than God. Mankind has been robbed of the significance, the meaning, and the Scriptural context of \u201cthe One who stands upright.\u201d<\/p>\n

Further, the correlation between Yahowah and Yahowsha\u2019 was torn asunder when these rabbinical mistakes were compounded by Constantine\u2019s priests. They completed the sun-god deception by rendering the Greek word stauros<\/em>, \u201ccross,\u201d rather than \u201cupright pole.\u201d Combined, these errors cause us to miss the fact that stauros<\/em> is based upon histemi<\/em>, \u201cto stand upright and to establish a covenant.\u201d Yahowah was renewing, confirming and fulfilling while man was busy destroying, corrupting, and deceiving.<\/p>\n

I don\u2019t want to give the impression that \u2018dn<\/em>, pointed \u2018adon<\/em>, isn\u2019t accurate when translated appropriately\u2014at least on certain occasions. To know when it\u2019s appropriate and to translate it accurately, we must understand the etymological root of \u2018dn<\/em>. Etymology is: \u201cthe history of a linguistic form of a word shown by tracing its development since its earliest recorded occurrence in the language where it is found, by tracing its transmission from one language to another, by analyzing it into its component parts, by identifying its cognates in other languages, or by tracing it and its cognates to a common ancestral form in an ancestral language.\u201d With that in mind, the Ugaritic and Akkadian uses of \u2018dn<\/em> when vocalized as \u2018adon<\/em>, mean \u201cfather, master, and mighty.\u201d There are times when these applications are intended in Scripture. \u2018Adon<\/em> pointed this way usually refers to men who are regarded as \u201cmasters or fathers.\u201d Also, for those more familiar with \u201cadonay<\/em>,\u201d than \u2018adon<\/em>, the only distinction between themis vowel pointing designed to make \u2018adon<\/em> first person singular.<\/p>\n

But that leads to another can of worms\u2014actually it\u2019s the same can. Adonis is the alternate name for Lord\/Baal, the Satanic sun god. Therefore, using \u2018adon<\/em>, rather than \u2018edon<\/em>, in association with Yahowah is equivalent to calling God Satan or Satan God. The use of \u2018Adon<\/em> in Hebrew is identical to English speaking people using Lord in reference to Yahowah or Yahowsha\u2019. It is an abomination.<\/p>\n

At best, by using \u2018adon <\/em>rather than \u2018edon<\/em>, we miss the tabernacle connection and all that conveys related to the prophetic implications of the Miqra of Tabernacles, of God living with us, and with our bodies being His tabernacle, tent, and abode. At best we miss the connection of Yahowah being Yahowsha\u2019s foundation and Yahowsha\u2019 being the upright pillar. That leads to ignorance of the Upright One\u2019s significance and the upright pole\u2019s connection to Passover. At worst, we confuse God with the Devil and serve the wrong spirit.<\/p>\n

Moseh in Shemowth<\/em> \/ Exodus 34:23 combines \u2018dn <\/em>with Yahowah, \u2018El<\/em>, and Yisra\u2019el: \u201cha \u2018dn yhwh \u2018elohe yisra\u2019el<\/em>,\u201d meaning either, \u201cthe Mighty Master, and Father,\u201d or \u201cthe Foundation of the Upright Pillar,\u201d followed by \u201cYahowah, God of Yisra\u2019el.\u201d Yahowsha\u2019 bears this title in Psalm 110:1: \u201cYahowah reveals and declares to the foundation of the temple and the upright pillar <\/strong>(\u2018dn<\/em>), sit, dwell, and remain <\/strong>(yashab<\/em> \u2013 be seated and abide, inhabit as your home, be settled and stay, restore and renew) at my right hand.\u201d<\/strong> In this context, \u201cmaster, father, and lord\u201d are senseless.<\/p>\n

The standard excuse for the reckless use and vocalization of \u2018dn<\/em> as \u2018adonay<\/em> is encapsulated by The Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament<\/em>. \u201cTo avoid the risk of taking God\u2019s name (YHWH) in vain, devout Jews began to substitute the word \u2018\u0103d\u014dn\u0101(y)<\/em> for the proper name itself. Although the Masoretes left the four original consonants in the text, they added the vowels \u0115<\/em> (in place of \u0103<\/em> for other reasons) and \u0101<\/em> to remind the reader to pronounce \u2018\u0103d\u014dn\u0101(y)<\/em> regardless of the consonants. This feature occurs more than six thousand times in the Hebrew Bible [actually, 7000 times]. Most translations use all capital letters to make the title \u2018LORD.\u2019 Later the Jews substituted other words such as \u2018the name, the blessed, or heaven.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

But there is no Scriptural reference to \u201cvain\u201d in connection with the use of Yahowah\u2019s name. The Third Summary Statement had to be rewritten to justify the unjustifiable. \u201cYou shall not take <\/em>the name\u201d isn\u2019t how Yahowah began. Nasa\u2019<\/em> doesn\u2019t mean \u201ctake.\u201d It means \u201clift up, carry forward, and bear.\u201d Today, we would use, \u201cpromote, advocate, or tolerate,\u201d to convey nasa\u2019s<\/em> meaning. \u201c\u2018Adon<\/em>-Lord your God\u201d isn\u2019t actually in the text, either. Yahowah said, \u201cYahowah,\u201d not Lord, so who are we to edit our Maker? Then God engraved shav\u2019<\/em> in stone. It means \u201cdesolate or lifeless\u201d\u2014the worst of all possible consequences. He did not use the Hebrew words for vain in the sense of lightly, frivolously, arrogantly, or failed. Had He wished to do so, He could have chosen perfectly good Hebrew words to communicate any or all of those thoughts. To \u201clightly esteem\u201d in a \u201cfrivolous\u201d way so as to \u201cdisregard or ignore\u201d is nabel<\/em>. To lightly esteem in the sense of \u201ctrifling with\u201d in a \u201ccontemptible fashion\u201d is qalal<\/em>. Vanity in the sense of \u201carrogance or pride\u201d is ga\u2019avah<\/em>. \u201cFailure,\u201d in the sense of having tried in vain, is raphah <\/em>or karath<\/em>. So why would Yahowah say that the advocacy and tolerance of \u201cshav\u2019<\/em>-desolation and lifelessness\u201d in His name was unforgivable if He meant frivolity, disregard, arrogance, or failure were unforgivable? If these things are beyond redemption, why bother with salvation? All of us are guilty of failing to respect Yahowah\u2019s instructions, of being frivolous, ignorant, and arrogant. But we are not all guilty of advocating lifeless religious and political doctrines or of arrogantly disregarding Yahowah\u2019s name. Rabbis and Priests are, however.<\/p>\n

Enough about \u2018dn<\/em>. The third word of Isaiah\u2019s prophetic revelation to king \u2018Ahaz is huw\u2019<\/em>. It tells us that this is important, and that Yahowah \u201cHimself\u201d <\/strong>is \u201cassociated with\u201d the \u201cmiraculous witness\u201d of \u201c\u2018Imanuw\u2019el<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWill give\u201d<\/strong> is from natan<\/em>. This \u201cgift\u201d is \u201cpermanently bestowed.\u201d \u2018Imanuw\u2019el<\/em> \u2013 God With Us is \u201ceternal\u201d and \u201cset apart.\u201d He is \u201cdurably consecrated and eternally entrusted.\u201d He was \u201cdelivered up,\u201d so that we might \u201ccontinue to exist with certainty.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cA miraculous sign\u201d<\/strong> is repeated here. \u2018Owth <\/em>was also used in the introductory sentence. It means that \u201ca virgin giving birth to a Son named \u2018Imanuw\u2019el\u201d will be \u201ca wondrous symbol of God, demonstrating His power.\u201d \u2018Imanuw\u2019el will be \u201ca witness who serves as proof, as an example from which to evaluate, consent, and agree\u201d with Yahowah. Yahowsha\u2019 is as \u2018Imanuw\u2019el implies, the means to know and be reconciled unto God.<\/p>\n

\u201cBehold\u201d <\/strong>is from hineh, <\/em>urging us \u201cto pay attention,\u201d to take a close \u201clook, noticing the details.\u201d For there will be a \u201ctime at an adjacent site,\u201d Bethlehem, nine months before the Miqra\u2019<\/em> of Sukah<\/em> \/ Tabernacles in 2 BCE, \u201ca virgin girl<\/strong> shall conceive.\u201d<\/strong> Ignoring the details and the inspiration, Rabbinical\/Masters want us to believe that God chose the wrong word here and that he meant to say bethuwlah <\/em>(\u05d1\u05bc\u05b0\u05ea\u05d5\u05bc\u05dc\u05b8\u05d4<\/strong>), not \u2018almah <\/em>(\u05e2\u05b7\u05dc\u05b0\u05de\u05b8\u05d4<\/strong>). <\/em>Thinking that they were smarter and more important than Yahowah, the misguided clerics have told generations of Jews that God meant to say that the great miraculous sign was that a \u201cyoung woman\u201d would give birth to a son. Some miracle. Some god.<\/p>\n

\u2018Almah<\/em> always means \u201cvirgin or maiden, a young female who is unwed and has yet to mate.\u201d Bethuwlah<\/em> can mean \u201cmaid\u201d or \u201cvirgin,\u201d although even bathuwlah<\/em> is translated \u201cvirgin or maiden\u201d forty-three of the fifty times it is used in Scripture. So the problem is simple. There is but one claim to virgin birth: the Ma\u2019aseyah Yahowsha\u2019. If He were \u201cborn of a virgin, a young woman who was unwed and had yet to mate,\u201d He would have uniquely fulfilled the prophecy and be the Ma\u2019aseyah, \u2018Imanuw\u2019el, God With Us. While that is good, it\u2019s bad if you denied Him, spat at Him and nailed Him to a pole. And the crime became shav\u2019<\/em>-desolation because these rabbis have prevented millions of Jews from knowing Yahowah and being saved by Yahowsha\u2019. Hitler may have extinguished six million Jewish lives, but they annihilated sixty million Jewish souls.<\/p>\n

\u201cA Son\u201d <\/strong>is the<\/em> Son of God. This is obvious because He \u201cshall be called, recited, proclaimed, appointed and endowed\u201d <\/strong>with a most important and unique shem<\/em>-name. \u201cHis name\u201d <\/strong>is \u201cImmanuel.\u201d <\/strong>\u2018Imanuw\u2019el<\/em> means \u201cWith us is God.\u201d The Hebrew word which precedes, \u2018el<\/em> or \u201cGod,\u201d is based upon the consonant root \u2018mm<\/em>, meaning \u201cto comprehend and to include,\u201d the ministry and mission of the Ma\u2019aseyah.<\/p>\n

The \u2018mm<\/em> root provides the basis of many derivative vocalizations. Let\u2019s consider each of them. \u2018Im<\/em> means \u201cis with and is among,\u201d consistent with the Ma\u2019aseyah\u2019s status. \u2018Im<\/em> is used to \u201cemphasize inclusiveness and togetherness,\u201d consistent with the Ma\u2019aseyah\u2019s mission. \u2018Umma <\/em>is \u201cset apart and beside,\u201d concepts that would be contradictory outside the context of Scripture. The Ma\u2019aseyah was Qodesh<\/em>-Set Apart so that we might also be \u201cset apart\u201d from sin and death, living \u201cbeside\u201d Yahowah. \u2018Am <\/em>is \u201cpeople and kinsmen with an emphasis on relationship.\u201d Yahowah manifest Himself as a person, but not just any person. Yahowsha\u2019 was a Yahuwdy, of the tribe of Yahuwdah, a direct descendant of Dowd, Ya\u2019aqob, Yitschaq, and Abraham, making Him \u201ckin.\u201d As Ma\u2019aseyah and Savior, Yahowsha\u2019 is not only the way to restore and renew our \u201crelationship,\u201d He is the embodiment of the beryth<\/em> \u2013 covenant. \u2018Ammi<\/em> confirms all of this, as it \u201cis used of the descendants of Abraham whom God chose in association with the covenant.\u201d<\/p>\n

********<\/p>\n

Yada Yah\u00a0 <\/em><\/p>\n

Was Writen by Craig of <\/em><\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cAn Introduction to God\u201d found at <\/p>\n

All Glory be to Yahweh!<\/p>\n

*******<\/p>\n

Build a Swimming Pool in Kenya <\/p>\n

*******<\/p>\n

The Nairobi Business Directory \u2013 <\/p>\n

*******<\/p>\n

Make Money Online<\/a> \u2013 For Real \u2013 <\/p>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
<\/dd>\n
<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Yahowah sent His ben-Son into the world so that Gentiles could be adopted into His family, receiving Yahowsha\u2019s inheritance.It is one of the most beautiful uses of the father-son metaphor. Isaiah 40:5 says the same thing in different words: \u201cThe glorious presence and the manifestation of power, the person of Yahowah is revealed and made […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":483,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[145],"tags":[747,456,748,12,541,348,749,31,118],"class_list":["post-335","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-yada-yah","tag-ben","tag-gentiles","tag-his-family","tag-maaseyah","tag-prophet","tag-sins","tag-son","tag-yahowah","tag-yahowsha"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/empowernetwork.com\/pesamob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/empowernetwork.com\/pesamob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/empowernetwork.com\/pesamob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/empowernetwork.com\/pesamob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/483"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/empowernetwork.com\/pesamob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=335"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/empowernetwork.com\/pesamob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":343,"href":"https:\/\/empowernetwork.com\/pesamob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/335\/revisions\/343"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/empowernetwork.com\/pesamob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=335"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/empowernetwork.com\/pesamob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=335"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/empowernetwork.com\/pesamob\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=335"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}