Yahowsha\u2019s message was Yahowah\u2019s message because Yahowsha\u2019 is and was the human manifestation of Yahowah. It is why Yahowsha\u2019 said that He did not come to nullify the Towrah but to confirm and to fulfill it.<\/p>\n
Considering this, it takes a pretty puny human mind to think this prophecy depicts an Arab speaking on behalf of a dark spirit named Allah\u2014of a man who was ignorant and illiterate, a sexual pervert, bloodthirsty pirate and terrorist who spit on Yahowah\u2019s Instructions and who went to war, raping, plundering, enslaving and murdering His chosen people. But, despite all evidence to the contrary, this is the verse upon which Islam draws it credibility, its connection with the Towrah. But such is the pathetic nature of religion.<\/p>\n
As an interesting aside, it turns out that Horeb isn\u2019t in the Sinai. It\u2019s one of a thousand Constantinian errors. It\u2019s in Arabia. Yahowah parted the Gulf of Aqaba inlet of the Red Sea so that Moseh and the Israelites could flee the fast-charging Egyptians. Ron Wyatt, a biblical archeologist, found and filmed the remains of gold encrusted chariot wheels still visible in the clear shallow waters of the Gulf. Solomon erected a commemorative pillar on both sides of the crossing dedicated to Yahowah. The top of Horeb, the mountain of God, still shows the signs of having been burned. The foundation of the Tabernacle is visible below it, as is the dubious altar erected to Lord \/ Baal\u2019s golden calf. Even the rock Moseh struck with his staff to bring forth water can be plainly seen. If you are interested in viewing all of these great discoveries as well as seeing Noah\u2019s Ark and the marvelous history of the Ark of the Covenant, visit www.WyattMuseum.com and acquire his videotape series.<\/p>\n
Yes, I know that biblical scholars think that God parted a dried up swamp called the sea of reeds. But that\u2019s senseless. You can\u2019t drown charioteers in a waddi, and if the Israelites had crossed the sea of reeds they would have arrived in Gaza, and thus be inside the Promised Land facing the Philistines. But puncturing this myth, 1 Kings 9:26 has Solomon building a fleet of ships in Ezion, Edom on the shores of the Gulf of Aqaba, designated by the same \u201cRed (Sup<\/em>) Sea\u201d nomenclature.<\/p>\n Sinai is used interchangeably with Horeb to designate the mountain where Moseh received the Towrah and where he sat at Yahowah\u2019s feet. All we know from the Scriptural account is that Horeb is near the wilderness of Zin which is located outside Israel\u2019s southern border as it approaches the Gulf of Aqaba. If Mt. Sinai were actually in what we call the Sinai Peninsula today, it would be on the wrong side of the Red Sea to avoid a confrontation with the Egyptians.<\/p>\n Before we move on, please note that the idea of Yahowah revealing Himself in a radiant form seen as fire (radiant light and heat energy), and in the form of a man, as He did on Horeb, is best explained in Ezekiel. We\u2019ll review what that prophet saw in heaven in the next chapter. But before we go there, let\u2019s complete Moseh\u2019s pronouncement. He had a lot more to say that we need to understand.<\/p>\n \u201cAnd it shall come to pass<\/strong> (hayah<\/em> \u2013 exist and be accomplished) that any man who will not listen to or carefully consider <\/strong>(shama\u2019 \u2013 <\/em>hear) My Word<\/strong> (dabar<\/em> \u2013 advice, communication, statements, message and counsel), which <\/strong>(\u2018asher<\/em>) He [the Ma\u2019aseyah] shall declare in My name<\/strong> (shem<\/em> \u2013 title, authority, mark, designation, character, individuality, position, and report), I will question and investigate him, and will judge him, holding him accountable<\/strong> (darash<\/em>).\u2019\u201d <\/strong>(Dabarym<\/em> \/ Words \/ Deuteronomy 18:19)<\/p>\n That\u2019s clear enough. The Ma\u2019aseyah will speak for Yahowah; He will speak in Yahowah\u2019s shem<\/em>\u2014His name, character, mark, report, title, position and authority. That\u2019s rather powerful because this shem<\/em> belongs to the Creator.<\/p>\n The name of the One who spoke in Yahowah\u2019s name was Yahowsha\u2019. This name means \u201cYahowah Saves.\u201d His Words are Scripture. And His authority is universal, absolute, and everlasting. As such, this naby<\/em> was more than an ordinary man. He represents God and His Word in human form. He walked out of the pages of this Towrah to teach us what we needed to know about Yahowah.<\/p>\n The last line of the preceding passage provides yet another worthy insight. If you don\u2019t<\/em> listen to and carefully consider what Yahowsha\u2019 said in Yahowah\u2019s name you will<\/em> be judged and held accountable. That would suggest, what Yahowsha\u2019 would later confirm. If you do<\/em> listen to and carefully consider what Yahowsha\u2019 said in Yahowah\u2019s name, which was to affirm the Towrah, you won\u2019t<\/em> be judged or be held accountable. And that, my friends, is the moral of the story. The mission of the Ma\u2019aseyah was to free us from judgment. That is His gift. Those who do not accept His generous offer will be judged and held accountable for their sins.<\/p>\n What follows may sound harsh, but these are words the world needs to hear. They are directed principally at Paul, and indirectly at demonically inspired men like him, describing the means to identify a false prophet.<\/p>\n \u201cSurely, however <\/strong>(\u2018ak<\/em> \u2013but by contrast and to make an essential comparison, indeed), the prophet <\/strong>(ha naby\u2019<\/em> \u2013 the person who claims to be inspired and speak for God) who <\/strong>(\u2018asher<\/em>) arrogantly rebels, showing no respect, exaggerates and is presumptuous, seething in their conceit <\/strong>(zyd<\/em> \u2013 boastfully presumes and pretends to be something they are not as a result of a moral failure, is contemptuous, often enraged, insolent, rude, audacious, and disrespectful, treating something he dislikes very badly, while deliberating and scheming to defy, sometimes losing his composure in the process, insolent and mean-spirited (scribed in the hiphil stem which reveals that such prophets (the subjects) beguile by engaging and corrupting what God has authorized and instructed (the object) and also using the imperfect conjugation which affirms that they do so continuously with ongoing consequences)) while<\/strong> (la<\/em>) communicating<\/strong> (dabar<\/em> \u2013 providing testimony vocally or in writing) a message<\/strong> (dabar<\/em> \u2013 a statement or an account, a treatise or a word) in association with My name<\/strong> (ba shem \u2018eth<\/em> \u2013 in conjunction with My designation, reputation, or renown) that<\/strong> (\u2018asher<\/em>) I have not entirely inspired and completely directed him to say <\/strong>(lo\u2019 tsawah la dabar<\/em> \u2013 I have not wholly instructed and without reservation appointed him to convey, totally fashioned and absolutely authorized him to communicate (piel stem where the object is influenced and put into action and perfect conjugation whereby the act must be total and complete, without exception or reservation)), and who <\/strong>(wa \u2018asher<\/em>) continually<\/strong> writes and speaks <\/strong>(dabar<\/em> \u2013 who consistently communicates (imperfect)) in the name and renown <\/strong>(ba shem<\/em> \u2013 in conjunction with the designation or reputation) of other and different <\/strong>(\u2018aher<\/em> \u2013 additional and someone else\u2019s) \u00a0gods <\/strong>(\u2018elohym<\/em>), then <\/strong>(wa<\/em>) that prophet <\/strong>(ha naby\u2019<\/em> \u2013 this spiritually inspired foreteller),<\/strong> he, himself, will actually want to die, bringing a complete end to his existence <\/strong>(ha huw\u2019 muwth<\/em> \u2013 he has genuinely chosen to be oppressive and to kill, totally destroying himself while separating himself from life (qal stem denotes reality, perfect conjugation presents the total completion of the act, and consecutive form conveys the will and desire of the individual)).\u201d <\/strong>(Dabarym<\/em> \/ Words \/ Deuteronomy 18:20)<\/p>\n This statement was inspired by Yahowah. In context, it serves to compare Yahowsha\u2019 (who is the one spoken of in the 19th<\/sup> verse) to someone who would corrupt His message. So since Yahowsha\u2019 affirmed the Towrah, we should be looking for someone who came after Him who rebelled against it, showing little or no respect for Yahowah\u2019s teaching or Yahowsha\u2019s testimony. Since Yahowsha\u2019 was Towrah observant, we are looking for someone who schemed and spoke against the Sabbath, the Feasts, and the Covenant. And specifically, since every reference to this false prophet is singular, we should focus on the individual best known for contradicting Yahowsha\u2019 while presumptuously claiming to speak for Him.<\/p>\n I know such a person. He was arrogant by his own admission and constantly battled his pride. He seethed in rage against God\u2019s chosen people, writing horrible things about them which would haunt them for centuries. In a fit of anger he even condemned three of Yahowsha\u2019s Disciples. He was prone to exaggeration, claiming 99.9% of the world\u2019s population for himself. And he was a schemer, devising the most devilish plots against Yahowah\u2019s Covenant, His Towrah, His Feasts, His Shabat, even against circumcision. But most of all he boastfully and presumptuously claimed to speak for God, when in fact he deliberated against the very Word of God \u2013 showing contempt for it. What he said and wrote was not inspired by God, and worse, most of his message was diametrically opposed to what Yahowah had instructed, fashioned, and appointed in His Towrah. He even promoted the names of false gods, quoting Dionysus while basing his Gospel on the Greek Charities and Roman Graces. This man, this most false and prolific of prophets, was Sha\u2019uwl of Tarsus, known to Christians as Paul.<\/p>\n Zyd<\/em> is an especially provocative term. It serves as the juxtaposition of \u201carrogance and exaggeration, presumptuousness and contempt, uncontrollable rage and scheming deliberation, audacious disrespect and mean-spirited rebellion.\u201d And having studied Paul, having written extensively about his egotistical plot to undermine Yahowah\u2019s Towrah and establish the audacious notion of a \u201cnew covenant,\u201d one based upon placing one\u2019s \u201cfaith in his Gospel of Grace,\u201d I recognize that zyd<\/em>\u2019s every nuance serves to indict the founder of the Christian religion. It is a perfect fit.<\/p>\n That is not to say that everything Paul wrote was false. Had it been, he wouldn\u2019t have fooled anyone. Moreover, it isn\u2019t how false prophets prevail. Effective deceptions are almost always somewhat insightful. And that is why I find the application of the piel stem and perfect conjugation so revealing with respect to \u201clo\u2019 tsawah la dabar<\/em> \u2013 I have not entirely inspired and completely directed him to say.\u201d If you are Yah\u2019s prophet, everything you write in His name must be entirely consistent with that which Yahowah has \u201ctsawah<\/em> \u2013 instructed (towrah), fashioned (the covenant), and directed (the feasts).\u201d If every word isn\u2019t entirely inspired, completely accurate, and totally authorized then the prophet is false. There is no room for any deviation, any personal indulgence, any opinions, or so much as a single contradictory statement. When a person claims God\u2019s authorization and inspiration as Paul did, their testimony must be perfect, which Paul\u2019s was not. There is no latitude, no tolerance, no compromise, no accommodation for justification. You cannot exonerate a false prophet such as Paul by pointing out that some of the things he wrote were true. But you can expose and condemn him with a single stroke. His lack of respect for Yahowah\u2019s Word, His Name, His Towrah, His Covenant, His Invitations, His Terms, and His Way are individually sufficient to denounce him. His overt opposition to circumcision, the sign and symbol of the Covenant, is adequate.<\/p>\n The unique and enlightening nature of Hebrew stems, conjunctions, moods, and forms should powerfully influences the way we convey verbs such as muwth<\/em>, the \u201cact of dying.\u201d Here, the meaning of muwth<\/em> was shaped by the qal stem which prompts us to modify the concepts associated with the \u201ctermination of our mortal existence\u201d with words like \u201cgenuinely, actually, really, and literally.\u201d The nature of muwth<\/em> was further advanced by the perfect conjugation, which speaks of \u201cdeath\u201d being total and complete. But most intriguing of all, muwth was scribed in the consecutive form which conveys volition. It tells us that false prophets have not only chosen to forfeit the lives of others, but also that they, themselves, will prefer death to the fate which awaits them. You see, the souls of false prophets are not extinguished, ceasing to exist. They are judge and punished \u2013 sent to She\u2019owl<\/em> (a place which embraces Sha\u2019uwl\u2019s name) where they will wish they were dead.<\/p>\n Bringing these influences together, we discover that wa ha naby\u2019 ha huw\u2019 muwth<\/em> scribed in the qal, perfect, consecutive, cannot be accurately rendered \u201ceven that prophet shall die\u201d as it was published in the King James. We must account for the genuineness of the qal stem, the completeness of the perfect conjugation, and the desire of the consecutive form. Collectively, this leaves us with two options, both of which are equally valid. 1) \u201cThen <\/strong>(wa<\/em>) that prophet <\/strong>(ha naby\u2019<\/em>),<\/strong> he, himself, will actually want to die, bringing a complete end to his existence <\/strong>(ha huw\u2019 muwth<\/em>).\u201d<\/strong> Or 2) \u201cThen <\/strong>(wa<\/em>) that prophet <\/strong>(ha naby\u2019<\/em>),<\/strong> he, himself, has genuinely chosen to be oppressive, to destroy, and to kill<\/strong> (ha huw\u2019 muwth<\/em>).\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n False prophets are devastatingly deadly. Their message must be obliterated. The Christian incorporation of Paul\u2019s epistles into their New Testament has caused billions to die needlessly. Our ignorance of Mein Kampf<\/em> led to the death of 55 million people. Muhammad\u2019s Qur\u2019anic poison has been even more lethal. It has eternally damned three billion souls and soon Islam will lead to the deaths of 1.5 billion people in the Magog war. The solution is intolerance. False prophets must be identified, exposed, and condemned. It is the most reasonable and compassionate thing to do.<\/p>\n It is also the antithesis of political correctness. And that\u2019s because demonstrating a tolerance for deception serves the Devil.<\/p>\n \u201cAnd indeed if <\/strong>(wa ky<\/em>) you question <\/strong>(\u2018amar<\/em> \u2013 genuinely or consistently ask and say) in your heart <\/strong>(ba leb<\/em>), \u2018How shall we really know <\/strong>(\u00ad\u2018eykah yada\u2019 <\/em>\u2013 on an ongoing basis, where should we consistently look and what should we continually consider to actually be aware of, recognize, and expose (qal imperfect)) that the related message <\/strong>(\u2018eth ha \u2018asher dabar<\/em> \u2013 accordingly that this word) was not communicated<\/strong> (lo\u2019 dabar<\/em> \u2013 is not the Word spoken) by Yahowah<\/strong> (efei)?<\/strong><\/p>\n When <\/strong>(\u2018asher<\/em>) a prophet <\/strong>(ha naby\u2019<\/em>) consistently<\/strong> speaks <\/strong>(dabar<\/em> \u2013 is continually inspired to communicate the word (piel speaks of being influenced and imperfect addresses the ongoing nature of the relationship)) in the name and authority<\/strong> (ba shem<\/em>) of Yahowah <\/strong>(efei), and <\/strong>(wa<\/em>) that statement <\/strong>(ha dabar<\/em> \u2013 the message) not literally and consistently exist from Yah <\/strong>(lo\u2019 hayah<\/em> \u2013 not continually and actually be from Yah (qal imperfect)), nor never come into being<\/strong> (wa lo\u2019 bow\u2019<\/em> \u2013 or not ever actually happen (qal imperfect)), that which was said<\/strong> (huw\u2019 ha dabar \u2018asher<\/em> \u2013 that which was spoken or written) was absolutely not inspired nor spoken<\/strong> (lo\u2019 dabar<\/em> \u2013 was never influenced nor communicated by (piel perfect)) by<\/strong> Yahowah<\/strong> (efei).<\/strong><\/p>\n Through arrogance, with an inflated view of himself, self motivated, self reliant, presumptuous, and lacking any respect <\/strong>(ba zadown<\/em> \u2013 showing utter contempt and displaying moral depravity, through conceit and gross exaggeration; from zyd<\/em> \u2013 audaciously and disrespectfully, enraged with hostility, scheming and deliberating to defy),<\/strong> that prophet <\/strong>(ha naby\u2019<\/em>) has spoken <\/strong>(dabar<\/em>).<\/strong><\/p>\n You should never respect such an estranged individual who conspires to incite rebellion and invoke harm <\/strong>(lo\u2019 guwr<\/em> \u2013 you should not revere such strangers who plot against you, attacking those who are hostile to you and who stir up trouble and strife for you (qal imperfect)),<\/strong> keeping away from<\/strong> him <\/strong>(min<\/em>).\u201d <\/strong>(Dabarym<\/em> \/ Words \/ Deuteronomy 18:21-22)<\/p>\n When you get right down to it, what could be more important than knowing who is speaking for God and who is not? Should we trust the scroll scribed by Moseh recording Yahowah\u2019s testimony or the letters Paul dictated to unknown scribes? After all, the consequences are life and death, vindication or condemnation, adoption or estrangement, salvation or damnation.<\/p>\n Recognizing what was at stake, Yahowah has provided us with a definitive answer, both in style and substance. Since we have already considered zyd<\/em> and now recognize the attitude and approach of false prophets, let\u2019s examine what lo\u2019 hayah<\/em> and lo\u2019 bow\u2019<\/em> scribed in the qal imperfect infer about their content.<\/p>\n Hayah<\/em> (eie), the Hebrew verb conveying \u201cwas, is, and will be\u201d serves as the basis of Yahowah\u2019s (efei) name, and it reveals that \u201cYah exists.\u201d So recognizing hayah<\/em>\u2019s direct association with all things Yah, and its very juxtaposition with \u201cba shem<\/em> \u2013 in the name\u201d and \u201cha dabar<\/em> \u2013 the Word\u201d of \u201cyhwh<\/em> \u2013 Yahowah\u201d here in this statement, I\u2019m prone to read the qal imperative form of hayah<\/em> as \u201cliterally and continually exist from Yah\u201d in this context. It is thereby saying that unless a prophet\u2019s message \u201cactually and consistently comes from Yah\u201d one-hundred percent of the time, and thus can always be authenticated in the Towrah and Psalms, that prophet is speaking presumptuously of his own accord.<\/p>\n This being the case, lo\u2019 bow\u2019<\/em> reveals that unless a prophet\u2019s predictions all \u201cactually happen and come true,\u201d then he is not speaking for Yahowah. God\u2019s criterion is complete inerrancy and total reliability each and every time the future is foretold. No accumulation of reliable predictions, accurate statements, enlightening insights, or revealing commentary will suffice in redeeming a prophet who has made a single mistake.<\/p>\n These realizations bring us right back to Paul. Rather than finding confirmation of his pontifications in Yah\u2019s Towrah, Paul\u2019s message is repudiated by the Towrah. In fact in Paul\u2019s letters, Yahowah\u2019s Towrah is man\u2019s enemy. According to Paul\u2019s Gospel we aren\u2019t saved by the Towrah, but instead from the Towrah.<\/p>\n Equally incriminating, Paul got his one and only prophecy wrong. He not only incorrectly described the Taruw\u2019ah Harvest errantly known to Christians as the \u201cRapture,\u201d he said that it would occur during his lifetime. So while he would have been an uninspired false prophet by Yahowah\u2019s standard with a thousand accurate predictions and one errant prognostication, the founder of the Christian religion didn\u2019t get any right.<\/p>\n Therefore, by using Yahowah\u2019s test, both in style and substance: \u201cthat which was spoken and written<\/strong> (huw\u2019 ha dabar \u2018asher<\/em>)\u201d<\/strong> by Paul \u201cwas absolutely not inspired nor communicated<\/strong> (lo\u2019 dabar<\/em>) by<\/strong> Yahowah<\/strong> (efei).\u201d <\/strong>Further, \u201cthat prophet <\/strong>(ha naby\u2019<\/em>)\u201d<\/strong> known to the world as Paul \u201chas spoken <\/strong>(dabar<\/em>)\u201d \u201cthrough arrogance, with an inflated view of himself, self motivated, self reliant, presumptuous, and lacking any respect, showing utter contempt and displaying moral depravity, through conceit and gross exaggeration, enraged with hostility, audaciously and disrespectfully scheming and deliberating to defy <\/strong>(ba zadown<\/em>).\u201d <\/strong>And as a result: \u201cyou should never respect such an estranged individual who conspires to incite rebellion and invoke harm <\/strong>(lo\u2019 guwr<\/em>),<\/strong> keeping away from<\/strong> him <\/strong>(min<\/em>).\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n When we consider the thirteen letters written by Paul and the testimony regarding him in Acts, the only informed and rational conclusion that can be formed in light of this Towrah teaching, at least based upon Paul\u2019s repetitive and braggadocios claims of inspiration, his tendency to exaggerate his spiritual mandate, his prideful attitude, his hostility to God\u2019s chosen, his inaccurate prophetic statements, and overall contradictory message is that Paul not only failed this test miserably, but also that in the whole of human history, no one fits Yahowah\u2019s definition of a false prophet better than Sha\u2019uwl of Tarsus.<\/p>\n Every attempt to redeem Paul, even by those not completely poisoned by the myth of Christianity, even by those who recognize the value of the Towrah, is to ignore the many hundreds of statements in Paul\u2019s letters which demean and contradict the Towrah and focus on the few which affirm it. And even then they have to jump through hoops to justify and interpret what he wrote. I know, because I was once like them.<\/p>\n Moving from one false prophet to another, Muhammad never issued a single prophecy that came true as predicted. His most oft repeated claim was the Day of Doom, which he equated to the end of the world. He predicted that it would occur 500 years after his first revelation, thus in 1110 A.D. He had others, the most famous of which was that in the last days rocks would talk, helping Muslims murder Jews by revealing that Jews were hiding behind them. And then there is the one about everyone on earth having white hair and another of women outnumbering men a thousand to one. But since one foolish statement was sufficient, I\u2019ll spare you his moronic legacy.<\/p>\n Why is it then that Christians, Jews, and Muslims alike ignore this admonition? We are instructed to be vigilant and then intolerant of false messengers and messages\u2014to be hostile to them. Ignorance of this statement has led the world into great wars and poverty, ultimately culminating with the end of the world as we know it. Associating with those who forsake Yahowah, separating themselves and their message from His Towrah\u2014has hellish consequences.<\/p>\n By reviewing this prophecy, we have learned a great deal about the nature and purpose of God. Not only is there but one God, one Covenant, one Towrah, and one Way to Yahowah, He has provided the guidance we need to know Him and understand what He is offering. Equally important, He has done everything required to honor His promises. His predictions are reliable and His guidance is trustworthy. Man\u2019s are not.<\/p>\n It is no coincidence that Moseh\u2019s message was initially delivered to the Lowy, the people responsible for officiating at Yahowah\u2019s Miqra\u2019ey<\/em>. These appointed festivals foretold and explained the means to approach God and receive the benefits of the Covenant.<\/p>\n We have learned that the Ma\u2019aseyah\u2019s words would be Yahowah\u2019s words. So in other words, Yahowsha\u2019 affirmed the Towrah\u2014He did not replace it.<\/p>\n We also discovered that a human manifestation of Yahowah was necessary because God\u2019s minimally diminished glory and power frightens mortal men\u2014at least in our present state. For Yahowah to communicate with mankind in terms we would be able to comprehend, He would have to reveal Himself to us as one of us.<\/p>\n efei<\/p>\n The Yisra\u2019elites no doubt missed it, but when Moseh asked God to choose a man to lead Israel after him, His answer was prophetic:<\/p>\n \u201cThen <\/strong>(wa<\/em>) Moseh <\/strong>(Moseh<\/em> \u2013 one who draws out) spoke <\/strong>(dabar<\/em>) to<\/strong> (\u2018el<\/em>) Yahowah <\/strong>(efei), saying <\/strong>(\u2018amar la<\/em>): \u2018Yahowah <\/strong>(efei), the God <\/strong>(\u2018elohy<\/em>) of the Spirit <\/strong>(ruwach<\/em>),<\/strong> should actually and always want to summon and appoint<\/strong> (paqad<\/em> \u2013 should of His own volition take inventory of, genuinely evaluate and consider, assign and muster, and consistently supervise and lead (qal imperfect jussive) for all creatures to approach<\/strong> (la kol basar<\/em> \u2013 to facilitate the approach of all flesh) an individual<\/strong> (\u2018iysh<\/em> \u2013 a man or person) on behalf of<\/strong> (\u2018al<\/em> \u2013 over, near, closely associated with, and concerning) the community of the enduring<\/strong> witness<\/strong> (ha \u2018edah<\/em> \u2013 assembly; from \u2018ed<\/em> \u2013 testimony; from \u2018uwd<\/em> \u2013 permanent and restoring), who beneficially <\/strong>(\u2018asher \u2013 <\/em>on behalf of the relationship) may actually and consistently appear before their presence <\/strong>(yatsa\u2019 la paneh<\/em> \u2013 may genuinely descend to serve, actually come forth and consistently bring out (qal imperfect)), and who on behalf of the relationship <\/strong>(wa \u2018asher<\/em> \u2013 and who beneficially) will come before them <\/strong>(bow\u2019<\/em> \u2013 will arrive and return, come and go, pursue a harvest inclusive of them, carrying them away) for them to approach and be present<\/strong> (la paneh<\/em> \u2013 before their presence), and who <\/strong>(wa \u2018asher<\/em> \u2013 joyfully and as a blessing) will come to lead them out<\/strong> (yatsa\u2019<\/em> \u2013 descending bring them out), and who <\/strong>(wa \u2018asher<\/em> \u2013 beneficially on behalf of the relationship) will lead them in<\/strong> (yatsa\u2019<\/em> \u2013 extending himself to serve them),<\/strong> and then<\/strong> (wa<\/em>) the community of the restoring testimony<\/strong> (\u2018edah<\/em> \u2013 assembly of the enduring witness)